Seasonal Patterns in Mineral Nitrogen following Nitrogen Fertilization in a Loblolly Pine Stand

Nelson E. González-Süllow (MS student)

Committee: H. Lee Allen, Jennifer Bennett, Tom Fox, and Deanna L. Osmond (NCSU- Soils)

Introduction

Nitrogen availability limits production in loblolly pine plantation in the southeast US. Nitrate is generally considered quite mobile in soils and therefore subject to leaching if no rapidly assimilated into biomass. However, nitrate has several potential fates in soils: 1) denitrification; 2) assimilatory reduction; 3) immobilization in microbial biomass, 4) uptake by plants, 5) leaching, and 6) retention on exchange sites. The first three fates are microbially mediated, and would only be minor once nitrate moved into subsoil. If the subsoil cannot retain nitrate then it may leach into groundwater, running risks of nitrate contamination and reduced fertilizer use efficiency. The objective of this study is to look for the seasonal patterns of Nitrogen during the growing season and if there is a treatment influence.

Methods

The study site is located in a Piedmont loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on International Paper Co. land in Brunswick County, Virginia (36o 40’ 42’’ N, 77o 59’ 19’’W) (Figure 1). Mean annual temperature is 14oC and mean annual rainfall is 1092 mm. Soil drainage is classified as well drained. The soil at study site belongs to the Cecil Series (Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults). This site is one of the numerous field trials installed throughout the Southeast as part of the Forest Nutrition Cooperative (FNC) Regionwide 18 (RW 18) Study.

The main purpose of the Regionwide 18 study was initiated to develop a better understanding of the optimal rates and frequencies of nutrient application needed to achieve and maintain high rates of pine plantation in rapidly growing young stands. The Regionwide 18 treatment matrix considered two independent variables: annual average dose and interval between treatments. The study designs is a randomized complete block design with 4 blocks and have complete weed control in all treatments plots and a meteorological station on the site. Nutrients rates were 0, 60 every year and 180 kg Nitrogen (N) per hectare every other year. Other nutrient applied in a fixed ratio with N were phosphorus (P) at 0.10 x N on all sites and potassium (K), and boron (B) applied, at 0.40 x N and 0.005 x N, respectively, if and when, foliar analyses indicated a need.

A 40 m x 40 m treatment plot, with 20 x 20 m measurements plots centered within each, was established in each block for a total of 12 plots. The plots were randomly located within each block with a minimum buffer of 10 m between each plot.

This particular study (RW 180601) was planted in 1993. Prior to planting, the site was burned in 1992; herbicide (0.7 L Arsenal ha-1) was applied as aerial release to all plots, followed by planting loblolly pine seedlings at a density of 1680 trees per hectare in 1993. Urea and diammonium phosphate was broadcast applied by hand between 1999 through 2003 and has totaled about 335 kg ha-1 as N in the low fertilize plot up to 603 kg ha-1 as N in the higher treatment rate applied over a 5 years period. Fertilization application in the fifth growing season was done in the spring (early May to late April).

Sampling was conducted two weeks after fertilization (May, 2003) and on additional 6 sampling dates over the growing season following fertilization. At each sampling date, composite soil samples were collected from 15-20 cm depth and 90-100 cm depths of the mineral soil (A horizon). Also soil solution from lysimeter was collected from the same depth. Each composite sample consisted of soil obtained from 3 randomly located points within plot using a soil probe 2 cm in diameter for the 15-20 cm depth; for the 100 cm depth only one sample was obtained with an auger.

A 10 – 15 g sub sample was taken from each sample and dried at 1050C to a constant weight to determine field moisture content. Initial levels of ammonium-N and nitrate-N were determined by shaking fresh 10 g of soil with 35 ml of 2M KCL and distilled water for 30 minutes. Following centrifuging the supernatant was analyzed for ammonium-N and nitrate-N using an Automated Ion Analyzer (Quickchem 8000). Soil solution from lysimeter was measured with the Automated Ion Analyzer (Quickchem 8000) to analyze for ammonium-N and nitrate-N.

ANOVA of treatment effects for all measured and calculated dependent variables. Analysis will be performing to determine the effects of nitrate-N and ammonium in the soil. Analysis will be conducted for each sample date and for each depth sampled. All test of statistical significance will use a 0.10 level of significance.

Preliminary Results

  • Levels of Nitrate in KCl and water extraction at 20 cm depth in the 5 different dates were statistically different between treatments. 180 kg N were greater than control and 60 kg N.
  • Nitrate levels increased and peaked towards July in the 180 kg Nitrogen (N) per hectare every other year, and then it decreased to reached similar values to the ones before the application of fertilizer. The control and 60 kg per hectare every year remained basically flat. Questions remained on the fate of this nutrient.
  • No statistical differences for ammonium levels in KCl extraction were found but a couple of dates for ammonium in water extraction were found.
  • In the depth at 100 cm there was no statistical difference between treatments except for 148 days after fertilization where there is a movement of nitrate from 20 cm to 100 cm.